Target $18.72, page-6641

Ah, as expected. So we get to the conclusion that yourself (and many others here) don't actually read, nor understand the scientific papers or the conclusions. They just don't like what they read or see, and therefore it must be incorrect or full of BS. As I said to Hagetaka many times, and this now applies to yourself, or anyone else that just asserts claims without proof; go take an undergrade science class. You'll learn some basics there, and then maybe you'll understand and be able to engage in proper debate.

I am more than happy to engage respectfully (as I think I have done). I'll continue to call out those that are scientifically illiterate should they wish to continue to spout nonsense.

One can invest in coal, and accept the scientific evidence regarding the effects of the use of coal - they are not mutually exclusive. Yet some of you are so emotional and blinded by your investments that you fail to see reason and prefer to debate like a 5 year old.