Ann: Block 9 Alameda 2 Increase in Net Pay, page-275

Again, comments read in isolation. Over the last few days I was actually comparing IVZ’s lacklustre PR style vs MAY’s. I drew comparison to AP’s ability to build excitement around this drill/project and my disappointment at IVZ’s “fly under the radar” style, hence why I was a little surprised with AP’s subdued language in today’s ann. I asked two questions….1/why the subdued language now…2/is this due to a lack of confidence in upcoming flow test ie. will it flow? If that equates to a lack of integrity then I’ll wear it, but personally I think they are questions any astute investor would ask, holder or not. The fact you’re engaging in a tit for tat with Roch and considering carrying out the same behaviour speaks for itself….