Never mind float's patronizing remark; ''So you've read about it,'' which assumes that he is the expert and I have merely 'read about it''....which prompted my remark, while including the word 'probably,' which is not an assertion of certainty.
Which just goes to show your own arrogance, your false assumptions and your abusive nature. Why not stop focusing on the poster who challenges your assumptions and try to prove your case rationally. Are you able? Or is hurling insults the only thing you are capable of?
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- ufos...again!
ufos...again!, page-1669
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 870 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online