Share
9,425 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2184
clock Created with Sketch. 18/08/23
14:32
Share
Originally posted by Kouros8:
↑
This is what I was wondering about , do they object to the entire project or just the recent proposed expansion drilling ? The current DFS presents a good case for moving to production ASAP in my view. I believe all views and opinions should be taken into account and dealt with respectfully, especially if coming from local people of the area. Not being local myself I don't have on ground knowledge regarding the current proposed site for Extraction Wells and Production Site as detailed in DFS. I wonder do these particular locations pose similar concerns to those raised in Mr NewelIs Aug 10th SUWA article ? I think tourism and maintaining environmental values is crucial, surely there is space for both industry and environmental values and enjoyment. The right areas in the landscape for construction of all the infrastructure have hopefully been identified. I think concerns / objections like the ones raised by SUWA etc. are important to consider respectfully and give the company a great opportunity to undertake public engagement to make sure they get things right. The triple bottom line is imperative these days. It feels to me like bringing DLE production to this area of the US is getting much closer to being a reality now. I think if done right it can be hugely beneficial to local economy.
Expand
their objecting to the re-entries but we suspect this is only to stop the project directly as they have no power to affect the project as it all sits on state land where as these re-entries are on Federal land , here in lies the differences . Regards TT
