cuu and the potential , page-2

Everready

Desperate stuff spoken by an obviously desperate man about a desperate company.

As you will see by others who have posted on this stock there have been many individuals ready to claim highly respected expertise and use that to support the company prospects. Of course all of these individuals make these statements with the protection of anonymity and never use substantial fact to support their claims. You have recently entered the scene stating you have spent many years in the political arena yet you have not declared who you are or your relationship to CUU.

On the other hand I have stated who I am and my statements have been based on documented fact. You go ahead with your infinite wisdom and illustrate where my statements were incorrect. But please dont further illustrate your lack of credibility by attempting to associate me with conspiracy theories. And now you claim from an anonymous position with unproven credentials my comments are somehow illegal.

Character assassination with no supporting fact is the last resort of desperate individuals who cannot otherwise support their position.

You enter the scene this late in the game and declare you are somehow aware of my position. You declare that the management team of a company that has lost 71% of shareholder capital is such a good team. You regurgitate the rhetoric that the tenements are fantastic however that is continually proven to be incorrect. The QLD tenement is looking to be entirely worthless and now the flagship tenement in SA is looking to be worthless. Perhaps you can explain why a company that enjoys reporting an association with so many geologists can get it so wrong so often.

So lets forget your journey on the MV self promotion and lets look at facts of interest to public investors. You have claimed you have held a position of political influence for a long period of time and are a person of some knowledge of public companies and yet you provide unsubstantiated support for a company with such a catastrophic performance. This detracts from your credibility more than any statement I could make.

Considering the ferocity of your posts and the ridiculous claims you have made I think it is time for you to put up or shut up if you want to be taken seriously. Who are you and what is your relationship to this company?

Perhaps you can find the time in your busy schedule to explain the relationship to Opes Prime rather than this desperate attempt to undermine me. Perhaps you can explain the relationship of all parties to Seckold. Perhaps you can shed some light on the performance of other associated companies.

The fact is this company has next to no potential without the SA tenement and the latest series of results indicate that is far from viable and therefore worthless. The QLD tenement is an insult to the intelligence of any investor. The fact is that the short term rating of 5/5 given by Bell has proven to be highly inaccurate so far. How would you know the position of SK. They are interested in product not this embarrassing nonsense.

Hopefully you will be the next big thing for CUU on HotCopper because I am struggling to find a single positive point at the moment. However if you are to be the next big thing your posts will have to get much better if you want to be taken seriously.