___lets not keep it a secret.

I am not and never have been one for the belief that management should be buying shares to show their support for the company, what these people do with their cash is none of my business.

What is my business is what they do with our cash. The fact that they have been party to accepting rights in lei of payment is enough for me, and it certainly puts them in a more precarious situation than asking them to buy shares.

Think for a moment if we had had to come up with cold hard cash to pay these men how much further behind we would be. Indeed if they had taken that cold hard cash and bought shares at today's prices the gap would be doubled to what it is now for them and indeed us. So the reality is we should be thanking them for their early endeavors to resist temptation and dive the hand into the donut box.

I understand that it is nothing short of a monumental feat to get the company to where it is now. It is also my opinion that the internal reorganisation has as a necessity changed the entire dynamic of the company, so in effect it really has made the quarterly figures that are due out less than relevant to the new structure. This in reality is I feel part of the problem behind the non committal of management to pushing the company into the limelight.

The quarterly will not reflect the new direction and is likely to look bad on the surface.

However I still think we need better promotion of the company, the adage of conservative directorship is a fine reputational protector. But it is doing naught for the share price.

As it stands today my conversion from the resurgence is underwater, as it is for others that converted (and I cant bare to look at what my hard earned savings, that I bought shares with, has turned into). Some payback for the contributors to the fund obviously loyalty has its price!

Just as loyalty has its price so does fame and fortune it may well be that some reputations need to stick their necks out a little further than just playing it on the safe side.

The question is how do we get the message through to them that we need to have the press in on this as well. I'm sure that a well penned series of releases to the newspapers would be a great start, and John Wilson has shown that he is no slouch with the pen. The next would be the road show for brokers with Mark Bouris on the charge.

An Icebergs mass is 90% covered just like the work that goes into TZL, we are aware of that and much praise has been heaped on the board in the last year for that work (lets not forget the lowly employees who do their job with no glory), however the prospective investor makes their judgment on the top ten percent, and unless we light it up they will miss it, after all we are only a small iceberg.

So now is the time to start the rolling press releases, the share holders are still hurting, there's no time to rest on the laurels. The systems are working flawlessly you say, well tell the world! We have entered the new age of information security; lets not keep it a secret. After all there are only so many newspapers I can email and I'm not Mark Bouris so my name carries no weight.