I don't think you know what you're waiting for mate....you have confused the Voice with the Uluru Statement , and now you claim something about a lawsuit which you can't provide evidence of? It seems pretty clear that you have very little idea of much at all.
I'm happy to wait for the lawsuit link though as that will show you're not a total dill if you can provide it, there's your challenge for the day.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- voice is unconstitutional - high court decision
voice is unconstitutional - high court decision, page-35
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm