Free livestream of New World Metals Conference (today @ 3.30pm AWST), page-172

Thanks for the clarification. Because we have some serious advantages on cost already, my perspective was not so much about what is cheapest option but what will involve less impact environmentally. I'm aware that my google sources were talking very generally about mineralisation usually difficult to separate, like gold, which also involves nasties in the processing stage.

My perspective was that we as shareholders need to be aware that although the heritage laws were suddenly pulled, we still have an overriding duty to not be total @Holes like Rio, and to do the right thing by the Aboriginal people who have an abiding interest in the land, and we also have a reputation to maintain.

So in my generalised cluelessness I took a punt and assumed POx to get a response as this usually works...If PLS is getting away with flotation, and that's usually enough for recovery for pegmatites, and it's enough or best practice for remediation and environmental perspectives, then OK!

PS with the Ni there was also a near 100% correlation between the visuals and mineralisation from on the lab reports. The visuals with the Li pegmatites have been very exciting indeed.