Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-15971

WMHB, As always I really appreciate the effort you put into your posts. On this occasion I disagree with most of the content..

Unfortunately so many people be in this modern world are totally inflexible in the views , beliefs and strategies. Any little change in the wind direction, and they are incapable of responding rationally. As you like referring to ships and boats, just remember how a good skipper on a racing yacht runs his boat and crew. They are the ultimate in flexibility. They have to be that way to win the race! Slick would understand how important this strategy is.

Our skipper LC and the Commodore of the Fleet PH have demonstrated these traits all the way with IMU. And put us in a strong position to win the cancer race.

I would argue the business strategy hasn’t changed at all. As you stated LC first choice is acquisition followed by partnership or licensing. IMU have now added the flexibility of being able to take the products to market. If the first 3 preferences don’t attract a sufficiently attractive deal.

What they have effectively done is slipped an extra ace into their negotiating hand. Nothing has changed in strategy , they’ve just added more flexibility. More opportunities!

Where were all the blood curdling screams when IMH added CF33 to the business strategy. That’s right there wasn’t any. It’s different this time because the small detail holders who evaluate the company solely on SP don’t understand the deal. They don’t have the ability to analyse the recent events and put them into context.

How does the company explain all the complexities surrounding this move to smalk shareholders who don’t. Have open minds and are totally i flexi when their self created expectations don’t materialise in their timelines.