Ann: Strong mineralisation, substantial porphyry potential at CC, page-163

Far from being a lifestyle company, Bruham. When things were tight, Peter did not draw on his entitlements, but backed the company with his own capital. Fact. Skin in the game as well as his family.

There are many resource companies in the same boat in the current market. The retail holder has not got sufficient disposable income in this market to spike demand. It is one of accumulation for market makers taking from spooked retail.

It will matter not when institutions get on board as further results flow.

Its easy to sling off under a guise of facts and imagination, but you offer no depth of analysis that is credible. Just baseless diversions. Bruham, there have been countless times old fella, when your so called facts have been illusory. Do we need to point them out again? Peole in glass houses should not throw stones. You have been called out a number of times on other stocks too. Do we need to refer to those too?

It seems to me you want to top up. Why else would someone who holds dis a stock that has proven hundreds of meters of mineralisation. The only issue is that of time, not quality. All in due course.