Penikat; Natura is tough and targets speculative, page-5

Dear Goldies/KRM-representative,

ESG might also require representing correct facts and references instead of regular
soft marketing talks,

Would you specify the things happened during the year
1) what environmental studies, with references?
2) what community engagement, with which organizations and when?
The article by a senior of Nature conservation union Lapland refers to a community engagment, which
apparently failed
3) leadership of which organization has changed, and where is the evidence that it would be "PRO MINING"

"This would likely be an underground mine with little to no disruption on surface except setting up"

Is KRM promising that the close to the surface parts will no be mined and would also remove these from the resource estimates?.
Written and solidly guaranteed promise as an agreement by the by the company board would a some start of the discussion.

Please provide just one example, anywhere in the world
1) a tunnel mine (not open pit), ,of which operations are all underground,
This would appear to be a geometric impossibility because the volume rock material is doubled when it is mined
from solid rock to waste stone or processing waste
2) a tunnel mine in the raining conditions and bed rock of Penikat region, where the draining of the mine does not affect
the ground water levels and surface waters

Please provide the examples mining in similar Natura in Nordic countries.
Sakatti is fake news in this category. There is no environmental permit nor mining license in Sakatti.
The Sakatti EIA process showed that there major legal challenge requiring even change of law and
the EIA and Natura estimates will challenged at permit stage.
Sakatti and Mawason have been drilling in Natura, and these have been challenged with good arguments