The article mentions the psychological $1 barrier.
However I'd prefer we didn't consolidate for the reason that the stock has lost some 95% from the highs a few years back, and pyschologically speaking, I reckon there's a greater likelihood of the sp going from 10c to 50c in 5+ years than going from $1 to 5$ even though the multiple is the same. Other reits than thos mentioned have more stock outstanding than VPG - for example cer has a third or so more and are sub 20c, and GMG has over 3 billion (correct me if I'm wrong here). So why was VPG indicated in the article - someone know something we don't?
As for dividends - I'd prefer the sp to increase at the expense (although they are interrealted). At 10.5 cps, any more movement is 5% and likely to be more than any div.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?