Ann: DRC Battery Metals Forum, page-14

Note the bolding of text - that a purposeful statement

In front of Day 1 of Battery Day where i expect most people would attend

in front of DRC government

On the international stage

DRC wouldn't want people saying that if it wasn't true, could they have stopped AVZ? I expect they are in conversation and I expect they could have convinced AVZ to soften it up but i will admit its not much to go on.

But what is more evident is the overwhelming positive momentum in this event VS non-holder negative view... What a joke they are..

Its an opportune time to remember, the core of the issue was never AVZ 75% but rather Zinjin 15%, we seem to have been distracted by comminiere antics to which this bolding proves there is unlikely to be an issue with the 75%... Once ICC solves the 15% its done - either in favour of Zinjin (who continue to stall) or in favour of AVZ who are the aggressors...

Then its up to felix to run with a battery initiative under his belt, no doubt what he discussed with Biden, OR to run for reelection without... Doesnt take a genius to know what he prefers...

Truly i look forward to the day non-holders disappear and @asb83 tells us he was long all along... hehe sorry i know that was uncalled for but honestly, nobody likes these posters - why stay here if you dont hold? Very disturbing behaviour