Why is there not a third scenario being considered here?
Could a third party not purchase ZOLEO Inc?
Would Iridium purchase the JV?
Are there other players who might look at it?
In all these scenarios, Beam could still own the IP, manufacture and sell the item to the ZOLEO entity.
We lose the recurring revenue, but if it maximises value of ZOLEO for shareholders, why not?
Ann: ZOLEO Inc. Joint Venture Ownership, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BCC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
14.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.53M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22499 | 13.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0¢ | 30000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 01/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BCC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable