Your argument doesn't make much sense since you've pinned the independent expert's opinion on completely made up numbers (by your own admission). I don't get what you're trying to say here. So the expert won't value this above $3 a share because you've decided to make up some random numbers and therefore that is now the truth? Come again?
If it does turn out to be the case, then I'd love to see the detailed breakdown of how this apparent expert came to that conclusion.
Ann: Albemarle indicative proposal - due diligence to commence, page-362
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
67.0¢ |
Change
-0.045(6.29%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.624B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 70.0¢ | 71.0¢ | 67.0¢ | $10.52M | 15.42M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 385809 | 66.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 67.5¢ | 116000 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LTR (ASX) Chart |