think what you wish zipper. Broad generalisations may suit you when they are used to support a particular perspective you hold but are as tedious as you find my attempts at unpicking the generalisation. Why use a generalisation or line of argument if you don’t even believe it? That’s not just illogical but intellectually bereft.
or are you suggesting that I have made sone form of generalisation?
I’d suggest to you that the use of the term classic pedant is dangerously close to argumentum ad hominem. What’s the point?
