Ann: Successful Appraisal of South Erregulla, page-57

I stand to be corrected. I prepared that figure a while back. idk where i got the 113m Kingia figure, but the announcement says what it says...unless 52 m refers to gas saturated sand, and the 113 metres refers to total "formation" thickness (i.e. gas saturated and non gas saturated layers of the Kingia). I def was not adding Wagina and Kingia.

The isopach map shows you where the depositional centre of particular sedimentary layers occurs. The key point i was trying to make was that STX ground appears to be in the Kingia depositional centre. Looking at it again, according to Ferdinando's interp, and the announcement youve pointed me to, it shows not much variation of gross Kingia thickness across SE1 and SE2 at all...