I don’t understand the “FLC was a tax loss for Ron” angle - nobody would purposely invest (or remain invested) in something that will lose them money in order to pay less tax (but still have less cash overall) - it doesn’t make sense? Yes it will be a tax loss now offsetting his other tax gains - but this can’t have been the original purpose?
Ann: Fluence to Raise up to A$40.7M to Substantially Reduce Debt, page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
