Climate Change, page-377

Lots to break down here, so lets go.

Malcolm Roberts says many times in the clip "Clearly significant" "A statistically significant" "That is a statistically significant huge increase in deaths" and so forth.

Firstly, statistical significance is a mathematical formulated number. You cant tell statistical significance from a graph - it must be calculated. It might look statistically significant, it might well and truly be a statistically significant difference, but you must calculate it.

He then goes on to say "William Sy "A statistical analysis of covid 19 injections etc....Shows a graph clearly showing a correlation of excess death up and down with the injections"

I haven't verified whether the data William Sy is using, but for arguments sake I'll accept that the raw numbers are correct.
Well, as you would know, correlation is not causation.

Its interesting that you accept some ABS data regarding excess deaths etc etc, but dont accept ABS data regarding some covid statistics....cherry picking sound familiar?

The doctors on the panel then go on to give sources of peer reviewed papers and a bit of an explanation to Malcolm Roberts, but I guess you ignored that part?