I don't mind answering direct questions.
Sibanye have enough spare capacity that they want WWI ore.
I don't know of any other companies nearby likely to do a deal with Sibanye. The likelyhood of any project (if they even exist) that will leapfrog WWI and lead to their agreement being cancelled in favour of another operation is tiny imo.
A contract has many clauses and stipulations? My goodness I'm shocked. Whatever the specifics it's a good deal for both parties. Sibanye reduced spare capacity and WWI get a cost effective ore treatment option
Ann: WWI Completes $1.2M Placement, page-99
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WWI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $35.58M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.5¢ | 1.5¢ | 1.4¢ | $24.99K | 1.743M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 7125026 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 89058 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WWI (ASX) Chart |