Not all the ore will have Ni for the entire say 260m so maybe 3.64mt of Ni is too high.
The good doctor has called out recently a potential drill out target of 2mt Ni in this top 300m so that is a potential target before extraction rates.
I think that would roughly mean about 150m of Ni at 0.2% instead of 260m.
It may obviously change somewhat after these assays all come in so will be interesting to see what target next year they are aiming for.
Ann: First RC Assays Show Broad Zones of Mineralisation, page-29
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WMG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
34.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $26.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22000 | 36.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 38.5¢ | 1625 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WMG (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable