IF A (Institution) lent shares to B (shorter) who then sold them to C (or lots of C's) then wouldn't all the C's have voting rights???
I can't see how A or B would have any rights over shares they no longer own - but I've also heard the same share can be shorted more than once? - so who in fact "owns it"??
This shorting sh*t does my head in - buy hey, it supposedly adds liquidity right
Dont forget to Vote before 3pm, 21st Nov, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 88 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WBT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.96 |
Change
-0.040(2.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $377.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.98 | $1.98 | $1.91 | $706.3K | 359.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 347 | $1.96 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.97 | 821 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.22am 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WBT (ASX) Chart |