Climate Change, page-511

I love proving you wrong, so I went back and found your posts. Page 2 on this thread.

So you said this


And I said,



Then you backtracked when I called out your BS



Oh, it was IMPLIED. That sounds like you changing quotes/ or making something sound "alarming" when that wasn't even said. Now who's being dishonest?


So I replied



I couldn't find any scientist saying it would take 100's of years to fix the ozone layer, and because it will be almost fully repaired by 2066.

You then posted a source


I went and checked your source - this is why I always ask someone to verify what they have claimed.


Then you just assert that you are correct despite your own source saying something different.


Clearly, if the science was actually correct, and it'd take 100's of years to return to 1980 levels, then there would be some papers and research and evidence to show that. Your assertion means absolutely nothing. You're a dishonest person and I hope everyone is starting to see through your lies.

You then posted this


Now, your quote "The recover of the ozone layer will not be instantaneous and will take hundreds of years for the global ozone column to return to its pre 1980 level" (p.10).

I googled that quote, and got zero hits. I checked the source you posted, and that sentence or any variation of it doesn't show up at all.



This poster found this within your source which showed you being wrong


To which you then just ignored any other raising of this topic.

I love catching you in a web of lies. I hope everyone can just have a quick read of this to show how much of a dishonest debater @hagetaka is.