TLG Chart, page-3041

In fact we can see that thisvery same “military Schengen”was talked about from 2017 onward. And there are many new and coming obstacles that could throw a wrench into this whole plan. For instance, from the above wiki we see the initial plan revolved around the Netherlands as key central node, and lo and behold the recent news of Geert Wilders’ “stunning victory” has upset the apple cart:

The point is to highlight that thetrendin European politics does appear to be slowly veering away from many deepstate/establishment positions and initiatives, so while this is a rough generalization, it would appear likely that many of these NATO dreams will face increasing friction and opposition in the future, with their likelihood of coming to fruition going down each passing year.

Of course they’re also taking preventative action to staunch the loss of their political power. For instance, there have been recent calls and pushes for the abolishment of veto power in the EU, and the same goes for things like the UNSC:

Source

They’re clearly preparing for a future where increasing opposition completely deadlocks the ruling class’s ability to push their geopolitical agendas. They want to preempt this by robbing unruly members from being able to spoil their plans. For instance, they’d love to take away leaders like Viktor Orban and Slovakia’s Robert Fico’s ability to veto EU and NATO accession for Ukraine.

Thus, there’s a sort of power creep happening—as “nationalist” or anti-establishment figures slowly take control of European countries, the fascist EU nomenklatura seeks to abolish those countries’ abilities to have a real voice or say in anything. This is why, initiatives like the NATO ‘military Schengen’ plans are up in the air as it will all depend on which side gains the lead in this escalatory power game.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/sitrep-112523-major-avdeevka-breakthroughs?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-64190f49-a517-403b-afef-d5b98cf7abfc