South Erregulla #3, page-192

My reply to @gridder was made not knowing exactly who he/she was responding to, and it didn't matter as it doesn't alter the topic of discussion.

@specking - "be wary of contributors on this forum that DO NOT hold a vested interest ($$$) in this company."

I actually believe that it is healthy for open objective discussion from both sides of the fence regardless of their holdings. It is often useful to read factual/logical rebuttals simply because as holders, we will have a positive bias, compounded by confirmation bias if everyone is always in agreement. What isn't useful/helpful is constant positive views in the face of negative information, or vice versa.

Now where's that SE3 result?

618