hi mate
it seems a bit crazy that the npv’s are based on an 8% discount rate, particularly given that the risk free rate (govt bond) has increased by over 300bps recently.
the risk premia should have been maintained, therefore a discount rate in well in excess of 10% should be used.
I understand using 8% makes comparing PEA’s between companies easier, but reality is no one would buy a mine with a finite life for an annual return of 8%.
I don’t have a model but it would be interesting to know what the NPV would be if you used say 12%. I suspect it would wash off about a third of the NPV.
LRS General Discussion, page-15259
Featured News
Add LRS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
19.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(7.32%) |
Mkt cap ! $532.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
20.0¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.0¢ | $1.281M | 6.502M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
28 | 3441322 | 19.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
19.5¢ | 227823 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
28 | 3441322 | 0.190 |
17 | 4542684 | 0.185 |
13 | 346188 | 0.180 |
2 | 35319 | 0.175 |
3 | 60000 | 0.170 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.195 | 227823 | 2 |
0.200 | 1004053 | 6 |
0.205 | 502683 | 13 |
0.210 | 574060 | 9 |
0.215 | 3022055 | 24 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LRS (ASX) Chart |