It's high time it came to court. But, IMO we are a long way from justice yet. This case has the trial for manslaughter but there's also the issue of police body camera vision -
do we see changes to how police were releasing vision that suited them when they arrested people - days after the arrests and when the charges either had been laid but not taken to court or weren't even laid yet ---------- as opposed to the vision of this incident which police refused to go public with - because obviously it would have been devastating for their reputations, government reputations and just plain decency?
well - if there have been new rules in place - I sure haven't seen them.
this is a huge part of justice which needs to be dealt with.
We either show all or we show nothing - it must be consistent.
Then, when we understand that the introduction of body cams had several reasons for introduction -
One was for the safety of public, the reassurance in their police force -
well, that's blown out of the water by police picking and choosing what they release and what they don't - clearly they are releasing what shows them in a good light and they are hiding what shows them committing atrocities.
that is as far from justice as one can get.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- 95 Year-old Dementia Patient Tasered By Police.
95 Year-old Dementia Patient Tasered By Police., page-674
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)