OK my last reply on the subject. Confused why there is a focus on the rate of change in growth, i.e. the second order change (log scale). So if we have a 50% growth the one year and again 50% growth the next you would argue that the rate of growth is now 0% and this is somehow negative? That is some spinning a narrative.
The trick with complicating the demand growth using the rate of change in growth is that using your last sentence is then usually thrown in which is completely false.
You stated : The simple fact is EV sales have slowed,
Which seems harmless and one reads this in all headlines, however be consistent if you are complicating things. It should be
The simple fact is the growth rate in EV sales have slowed.
And again a slowing growth rate is not negative, it is just a way to spin huge demand growth in a subdued or negative manner.
Thanks for the debate. I am done thanks.
Good News & Bad News, page-36331
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11,082 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.89 |
Change
0.040(1.40%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.703B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.78 | $2.89 | $2.78 | $29.90M | 10.51M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 39193 | $2.88 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.89 | 73947 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |