Higgins vs Lihrmann, page-1591

Did it ever occur to you what the implications would be if there was shown to be any truth to what was stated in the Australian?

It would be in the reach of folk to argue the alleged victims intent on entering the suite was not of nature as portrayed to the public.

Of course we don't know of its truth any more than we know what you argue about the claims of the ex house mate ... but you talk like it's the truth.

Do you pick and choose what you decide to believe when its untested?