Those p values are absolutely fantastic for such a small study. Just because a particular measure doesn't reach statistical significance in a small study doesn't mean the effect isn't real. Formally, a p value of 0.0647 for MB-CDI Total Vocab for example means the improvement had a 6.47% chance of happening randomly rather than being real. Given the totality of the results, I would expect these measures to reach statistical significance in a larger P3 trial.
Ann: P2 trial shows significant improvements in Phelan-McDermid, page-41
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 170 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NEU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$15.24 |
Change
-0.240(1.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.940B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $15.20 | $15.33 | $15.02 | $3.919M | 258.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 726 | $15.23 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $15.24 | 121 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.19pm 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NEU (ASX) Chart |