It's a good question - what do MIN do. MIN are out of the money but we all know MIN are acting with Gina. Will MIN vote against - I don't think so.
If they did vote against - with 13% and any other retailers, they will most likely have a blocking stake. Why, because SQM and Hancock can't vote, meaning their 13.56% is effectively 21.80%. Remember, you only need 75% to prevent a scheme. It's likely not all the register will vote. If 87% vote, then that effective interest increases to 25.05% and they would have a blocking stake by themselves.
That means it reverts to the off-market takeover offer at $3.65. At which point, SQM/Hancock will get Creasy's, Adelphi and Directors' shares, taking their interest to 60.78%. Not enough for a compulsory takeover but enough for control of the company.
Do MIN stick it out and fight for an interest - not too sure. We know they likely want mining services - so a head nod perhaps and they vote for, arguing that if they didn't they would lose $0.05.
I'm changing to sell unless you hold on longer for 12 month capital gains purposes. I see better options in other lithium stocks.
Interests % Vote in Scheme Effective Interest 1 SQM 19.42% No 2 Hancock 18.37% No 3 MIN 13.56% YES 21.80% 4 Creasy 12.84% YES 20.64% 5 Adelphi 10.15% YES 16.32% 6 Directors 2.10% YES 3.38% 7 8 Control in Takeover (SQM/HAN) 60.78%
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZS
- Ann: Azures Enters Joint Bid TID with SQM and Hancock
Ann: Azures Enters Joint Bid TID with SQM and Hancock, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, Managing Director & CEO
Charles Armstrong
Managing Director & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online