is the weather severe enough?, page-172

  1. 84,744 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75
    I think that's a valid and important point ------------- not only did they not go with a trading scheme - but, they used denial as a mechanism for justification

    and that's a huge problem - because it brought about all these wacko followers who fell in line for the denial gig

    one could have accepted that they didn't bring in a trading scheme because of some kind of political belief or such -

    but, to deny climate change outright ------------ was the height of stupidity ------------- we see here now - right on hc and social media

    that these particular kinds of stupid people --------------- still think that there's no change - even though weather extremes are hitting us in the face all over the world - in growing numbers -----------

    and it's been mentioned time and time over and graphs, charts and data put up as substation time and time and time over -

    yet the idiots ask for substantiation every time -----------

    the boofhead sailor in FNQ just asked 'who says we are in an El Nino?'

    it's been discussed for weeks - references by NOAA, Bom, and god knows who else have been posted ----------- yet, these idiots ask
    'who says'

    there is stupid ----------- and there are particular kinds of stupid

    somehow they either miss all the news - or disregard all the news - all the scientific findings and opinions and or think that it's all a big conspiracy -

    they are truly amazing critters --------- unfortunately no one stopped them before they could lay eggs
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.