I think that's a valid and important point ------------- not only did they not go with a trading scheme - but, they used denial as a mechanism for justification
and that's a huge problem - because it brought about all these wacko followers who fell in line for the denial gig
one could have accepted that they didn't bring in a trading scheme because of some kind of political belief or such -
but, to deny climate change outright ------------ was the height of stupidity ------------- we see here now - right on hc and social media
that these particular kinds of stupid people --------------- still think that there's no change - even though weather extremes are hitting us in the face all over the world - in growing numbers -----------
and it's been mentioned time and time over and graphs, charts and data put up as substation time and time and time over -
yet the idiots ask for substantiation every time -----------
the boofhead sailor in FNQ just asked 'who says we are in an El Nino?'
it's been discussed for weeks - references by NOAA, Bom, and god knows who else have been posted ----------- yet, these idiots ask
'who says'
there is stupid ----------- and there are particular kinds of stupid
somehow they either miss all the news - or disregard all the news - all the scientific findings and opinions and or think that it's all a big conspiracy -
they are truly amazing critters --------- unfortunately no one stopped them before they could lay eggs
- Forums
- Political Debate
- is the weather severe enough?
is the weather severe enough?, page-172
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 188 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)