angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">"Nuclear energy is back," declared French President Emmanuel Macron at the UN climate summit in Dubai last week, summoning its revival after decades of decline.
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">France, a leader in
nuclear energy, is one of more than 20 nations — including the US, UK, United Arab Emirates and Japan — to have signed a pledge at
COP28 to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050.
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">Although non-renewable, nuclear is considered a clean energy source because it produces relatively low greenhouse gas emissions responsible for planetary heating, compared to oil, coal and gas.
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">Yet, the difficulty of
dealing with nuclear waste, which can remain radioactive for tens of thousands of years, and the potential for a
Chernobyl or
Fukushima-style disaster, makes it a contentious source of energy.
There are more than 430 reactors around the world — which collectively produce around 10% of global electricity — and 57 more under construction. This new pledge seeks to up that percentage at a time when
countries such as Germany have turned their back on nuclear altogether.
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);text-align:left;">What exactly does the declaration involve?
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">The declaration states a nuclear revival is critical for reaching net-zero emissions, keeping to the Paris Accord goal of limiting planetary heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit), and ensuring a
stable, low-carbon energy supply as the world transitions to renewables.
angea, Arial, sans-serif;padding:0px;color:rgb(0,8,33);font-size:18px;text-align:left;">Countries signed up to the pledge said they would work together to triple nuclear capacity on 2020 levels by extending the lifetimes of existing plants and building new reactors, including new small modular reactors (SMRS), which are potentially cheaper, quicker to build and safer than conventional ones.
DW LINK
so
@pints you are on the money.
the link above gives a good analysis of both pro-nuclear and anti- points of view.
but its the cost of nuclear energy that is the real issue. at least 10 years to build and expensive operation means that nuclear energy must be subsidised to make it viable for consumption.
and of course theres the permanent overhang of what to do with the radioactive waste, the management of which increases the overall cost of such energy.
did someone say that Albanese had commenced an inquiry into nuclear as an energy option?
