I have been always skeptical about the industry's AISC calculation, which uses gold oz sold instead of produced as denominal. However, I guess this has its own reason. For example, in WAF's case, if we use gold produced number (less hence unit costs higher), how can we justify the ROM stockpile? Had WAF processed all mined ores in the quarter, the production would have been well over 70koz, which makes the unit costs lower. So I think it's ok to use the industry method. My 2 cents.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WAF
- Ann: Quarterly Activities Report
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LKE
Lake Resources implies news article on job cuts made up; non-core sales "not material" and no rule 15.7 breach
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
Add WAF (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.40 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.586B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.41 | $1.43 | $1.39 | $6.185M | 4.412M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 29913 | $1.40 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.41 | 30620 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 29913 | 1.395 |
8 | 206266 | 1.390 |
7 | 84161 | 1.385 |
13 | 111373 | 1.380 |
8 | 91110 | 1.375 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.405 | 30620 | 3 |
1.410 | 18277 | 2 |
1.415 | 18277 | 2 |
1.420 | 3989 | 1 |
1.425 | 3989 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WAF (ASX) Chart |