I'll leave the reserve question to the more in tune guys, but MEL is easy. Acreage, potential reserves, proximity; and now substantial holding by LNG which would indicate a fair chance of them supplying Fishermans Landing. On a price per PJ of 3P basis MEL are 9 times cheaper than ESG. I hold ESG because they are clearly the biggest of the little guys. I hold MEL as I believe that they have some of the best acreage and potential for growth. MEL potentially has enough gas to supply a 3mtpa LNG project, which was conveniently announced a few days prior to the LNG substantial holder notice. A strong implication from the management.
The one thing I have not been able to work out is why ESG have MEL acreage shown on some presentation slides. I would love ESG to team up with MEL and LNG and do 8mtpa out of Fishermans Landing under the ICN contract. Baseless, baseless, baseless...but who knows. ICN are a forgotten one in this puzzle I feel; 2mtpa for 20 years is their deal with SinoGas.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ESG
- ann report
ann report, page-10
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ESG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
HAR
HARANGA RESOURCES LIMITED.
Peter Batten, MD
Peter Batten
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online