It appears quite straightforward to me. I've simply highlighted that AGY have previously set a clear precedent by reporting grade and production output, and there has been a noticeable shift in that practice. I've presented a logical reason for why this change is more likely negative than not. In contrast, your perspective seems to suggest that they just "chose not to include it" without offering supporting evidence or rationale. I'd encourage you to reconsider the logical or reasonable aspects of your stance, but I understand that critical thinking may not be your strong suit.
By the way, the repetition game seems to stem from your impulsive inclination to challenge opinions you disagree with. If you prefer not to engage in this back and forth, perhaps refraining from tagging/commenting would be a more suitable choice.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)