''Agreeing not to atand in the way doesn't mean they agree with the tax changes.''
oh yes it does --------------- agreeing not to oppose strongly indicates agreement with the concept. It at bare minimum suggests that they've go no better ideas - and that their original concept was not strong
you say that the only one losing here politically is Albo ------------------------------ fine, if you think Albo is losing politically here - please go right ahead.
IMO - Albo 'might' think that he's losing politically - but, IMO - he's not. It will be small fodder when it comes to crunch time for Albo - which is a long way off yet
he's got this for a second term - barring some unforeseen earthquakes
third term? too far away. The world may well be a totally different place by then.
oh - just for your interest ------------- 'silence is complicity'
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dutton backs Albanese tax cut changes
Dutton backs Albanese tax cut changes, page-54
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)