Hi Wurlitch, the in situ calculation I included is just raw niobium content, and the main peer comparison calculation is just assuming a fixed future WA1 niobium production (20kt/y) and inferring a valuation from CBMM multiples (and so implicitly their margins, recovery rates, etc. which, as I mentioned, is a bold assumption).
I don't have much to offer in regards to a direct estimate of the recovery rate. I appreciated the production paper you linked the other day, and I've found a smattering of other information available online (e.g. the NioCorp presser recently boasting a 90% recovery rate, likely a Hail Mary for their flagging stock, and this old CBMM publication which appears to claim a 96-97% recovery rate?). I've seen far lower number mentions mooted, possibly including your estimates. As I said, it appears to be a big uncertainty factor, which hopefully will be resolved positively. Cheers!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WA1
- General discussion
General discussion, page-4154
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7,124 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WA1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$15.35 |
Change
0.490(3.30%) |
Mkt cap ! $995.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$14.99 | $15.85 | $14.96 | $8.546M | 553.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1896 | $15.35 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$15.40 | 2726 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1896 | 15.350 |
1 | 634 | 15.340 |
1 | 2000 | 15.300 |
1 | 4369 | 15.290 |
1 | 37 | 15.240 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
15.400 | 2726 | 1 |
15.440 | 2365 | 1 |
15.800 | 200 | 1 |
15.860 | 64 | 1 |
15.870 | 343 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WA1 (ASX) Chart |