Ann: Notification regarding unquoted securities - MAY, page-79

Exactly why they should have deferred Zapato pending 3d. Which is what I called for. What % one pays for a duster is still wasted. It's not the cost but the wasted time that is important to me and most retailers. It is easy to take the high risk option when you are paying yourself 500 K of someone elses money. The question you need to ask, was the option of Zapato or the option of Alameda in the best interest of SH. It is unequivocal IMO that the latter is the case. What would the SP be now if we didnt waste 2 years? I will stick to logic not derogatory personal commentary, it merely degrades the perp. AP chose the high risk option which is MAYs Titanic moment. It has'nt recovered and may never. Yes if Zapato had come in, we would be better off but who in this industry would back a 2d wildcat vs a GSD, other than AP that is. Zapato was and still is a good future option, belatedly we will now have 3d before any further drilling if we survive that long. Im delighted for you that you feel this was a clever ploy in the best interests of shareholders. I dont think you have a backing chorus. Personal attacks are irrelevant, try and stick to the logic and assignation of an argument or motive is the height of ignorance: wrong and stupid. Whingeing is a matter of perspective, what I am saying is that there is a reason why the SP is shite and there are good reasons why, which is very relevant to todays share price. It is a current issue. Dismiss it as whingeing as you will, I see it as a pragmatic view that answers a current and probable future scenario. But be happy , whatever rocks your boat.