The similarities are striking that’s for sure.
What I don’t quite understand is if the original legislation was seen to have constitutional consequences, then how can an amended bill that is advertised as stopping PEP11 not have the exact same constitutional consequences.
I don’t get it at all
Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-18652
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12,879 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.09M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.0¢ | 2.1¢ | 2.0¢ | $9.162K | 458.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 770435 | 2.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1¢ | 2097822 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.10am 15/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |