King,
What is interesting is how Santos want to have it both ways. They say this:
"But it is worth highlighting that only four of these projects have binding offtake agreements in place. This includes GLNG - which has sold 5 million tonnes per annum of the total 7.2 mtpa from the two-train plant."
Got that. Binding commitment for 5mtpa.
One train is only 3.6mtpa.
At the same time they want to separate out an FID on their first train from the FID on the second. (No surprise why they want to under-emphasize the second train, given they don't have the gas for it).
So, the question is, how can you defer FIDing your second train, when you already have a binding committment for that second train?
Signing a binding contract to supply 5mpta is a de facto FID on the second train already.
Like all Santos communications, they trip over themselves in their efforts to downplay their need for ESG's gas.
yaq
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ESG
- david knox in darwin
david knox in darwin, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ESG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
UNT
UNITH LTD
Idan Schmorak, CEO
Idan Schmorak
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online