Nice deflection. No ability to answer the point, so misquote and move on.
I said that by your standards, JK "might be guilty but must be treated as innocent pending ASIC case".
Meanwhile, by your standards, you will treat all of ASIC, ASX, Visa, and most others, as completely innocent. You will also never ever suggest that any HC poster is a paid ASIC/ASX employee, and you will afford the assumption of truth to any who says they're a holder. After all, until it's proven they're not, how could you do otherwise?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2621
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 929 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)