They just need to show incremental progress, its so basic people otherwise have to assume the opposite.
Given management acknowledged the issue in December and still arent providing logical seqential periodic updates is astounding...(and if they were competent theyd leverage that opportunity to do so with enthusiasm right ?).
The fact that they've 'doubled down' on the terminolgy illustrates the opposite.. potentially interrupted as agression ? Why poor outcomes? Dislike of investors?
I mean is the seperation betwen board and management sufficiently effective here ?
