previous board were buying with ears pinned back at double this price. quite a few million shares. maybe that's because they knew what they were experienced US executives who knew what they were doing , and not so clearly out of their depth. on similar note, can we assume a 50% reduction in director fees as first cost saving? the fees were supposedly previously higher than typical due to need to have experienced US executives on the Board. now high fees are inexperienced aussie rabbits in headlights just simply filing their own boots?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
