MOVE your SUPER-TANKER out of my DEEP-WATER PORT, page-229

First time poster, long time observer.

I also saw his post 72682958. He did indeed try to insinuate muds were mixed with the whole sample from the DST. Ever since then, he has hidden his posts, and denied ever having posted it.

He is distracting with broadspectrum questions which could be interpreted many ways. Even if you state the BS&W percentage (which I also can’t find anywhere), he will just try to pretend that is not what he is talking about. That is the whole purpose of his broadspectrum questions, to move the goal posts.

You were 100% correct with the sampling from the manifold. Linebacker tried to take shots at it, but the sampling is basically the same as the extract of the CSG procedure you provided. I read your document, and they go on to talk about crude oil from the reverse circulation. He took aim at the “bubble hose” but this is actually a separating device at certain pressures (not just for making bubbles, but to separate dissolved gas from crude oil). There are many different setups the surface testing structure can take depending on budget, but I agree the manifold for the reverse circulation sample is the way to go.

I am thoroughly enjoying the banter, keep up the good work. I believe Flambeau is winning the debate, Linebacker is on the back foot ever since he revealed he didn’t know how the reverse circulation sampling occurred.