I was thinking the same question so googled it.
I may have it wrong but it looks like the smaller the nm gives the perception of better performance. Looks like we already have that in abundance at 60nm when compared to others. The articles below provide some insights into nm and question the importance as a classification. The real metrics of importance appears to be speed and overall power efficiency. So maybe 4DS should adopt another method to define the characteristics.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/394328/why-intel-may-move-away-from-defining-its-chips-as-10nm-14nm-and-more.html
https://www.hpcwire.com/2020/06/01/10nm-7nm-5nm-should-the-chip-nanometer-metric-be-replaced/
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- 4DS
- Ann: 4DS Australian Open Briefings Presentation
Ann: 4DS Australian Open Briefings Presentation, page-222
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 209 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add 4DS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
6.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.43%) |
Mkt cap ! $121.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.0¢ | 7.3¢ | 6.9¢ | $116.4K | 1.650M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 219062 | 6.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.3¢ | 28055 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 192062 | 0.069 |
9 | 792750 | 0.068 |
8 | 1288403 | 0.067 |
1 | 50000 | 0.066 |
2 | 24000 | 0.065 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.073 | 28055 | 1 |
0.074 | 140291 | 3 |
0.075 | 313999 | 2 |
0.076 | 16520 | 1 |
0.077 | 192981 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
4DS (ASX) Chart |