As usual Joe, you are confusing two separate issues.
There was no legal obligation to reveal to anyone (outside of a court case) the identities of the shareholders. The AFR reporting that he was privy (because he was a shareholder, along with his brother), doesn't change the obligation. Its a simple and a little nuanced but I expect you'd be more careful and less obvious making such a mistake.
I hope for better, but get the same.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Treasure Trove
Treasure Trove, page-680
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 358 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)