TLG - Media, page-15185

Thanks blondeaussie. I will say don't rule out any appeals against the exploitation concession. Sweden's system makes lodging appeals very easy and we know there are individuals looking to obstruct the project. We even have someone on the forum right now threatening to do this.

That being said, how much substance can any appeals possibly have if the Supreme Court gives the go-ahead beforehand? Talga's case is much more complete in comparison to the examples above, meaning those looking to delay the project can't use "unknowns" to their advantage. Basically everything would have already been taken into account by the courts during the environmental permit stage. It's also comforting to know that the exploitation concession is decided by CAB and the Mining Inspectorate and finally the National Government if required. We know for a fact that both CAB and the Government want the project to go ahead.