What is more efficient and environmentally friendly? Shipping lithium spodumene concentrate to other continents, leaving behind large hard rock mine sites, or shipping liquid spodumene with much less destructive effects on the local environment? And what has lower opex? And if Alex's calculations on X are correct (previous post above) - 1t LCE requires 7.5t spod concentrate from hard rock, but just 3.5t liquid spod from GLN.
General Discussion Banter GLN, page-14841
Add GLN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $87.68M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.5¢ | 19.0¢ | 18.3¢ | $411.8K | 2.222M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 671710 | 18.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 19.0¢ | 194077 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 17/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
-0.005 ( 2.63 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 18.5¢ | 19.0¢ | 18.5¢ | 817240 | ||
| Last updated 15.39pm 17/06/2024 ? | |||||
| GLN (ASX) Chart |
