re: the proof (tadtarga) sorry Student this is all bullsh!t I have never seen a valuation done in this ar$e about way. There is simply not enough information on the table to put a value on it, but the information and calculations we have seen are flawed. As tastarga said the NPV is not multiplied by a PE factor. A PE multiple applies to earnings, not NPV. This expert may know something about geochemistry but he has mixed and matched valuation methods which quite simply, cannot be blended.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.77M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 559003 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7¢ | 788295 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.21pm 15/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ADY (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable